haha dere cool ………..some of um look reli like liverpool jerseys!

pretty much my thoughts. i’m on a netbook, more specifc the 901 eeepc. i run gnome ubuntu 9.04 and it’s ok. now i want to install xubuntu 8.10 and then load the newly released xfce 4.6 to check how it runs.

In my point of view, a desktop (XFCE) that is unable to provide a software to edit the menu of application is certainly not a moder desktop, especially in 2009, especially taking into account the age of XFCE. Thus XFCE could be (menu is just one of the example) good… But not yet… But not sure it will ever be…
Regards

@ “Nell” (Who I must inform any readers did not supply a working email and so is unlikely to be ‘the’ Nell, although the non sequitor on condoms would be in character)

It’s never implied that Mary said any such thing about homosexuals. Instead, there are 2 paragraphs comparing the situations of homosexuals and atheists. These days making a sweeping statement about ‘the gays’ will most likely see you left out in the cold; and increasingly Christians are using atheists as their punching bag. If you’ve missed this, perhaps you didn’t re ad any further – the majority of the article does not directly address MK’s piece, rather briefly juxtaposes it with my views. It is not my intention to dismantle MK’s piece, nor to publicise her hateful words. If it was, I would have pointed out the factual errors like her exaggeration of Dawkin’s contribution to the “atheist bus” fund – Dawkins neither started the fund nor gave £8,000 toward it; he found out about it and pledged to match the donations if they could raise £5,000 themselves. The actual figures are a simple search on the internet away but the laziness, or indeed dishonesty from such a ‘journalist’ is to be expected.

It is with a hint of irony then, that I note your repetition of the word dishonesty, as if saying it 3 times makes it appear. Either you read one paragraph and made massive assumptions from it, or you chose to pluck out one little piece and base incorrect statements about it. What would you call that?

mary kenny and I imported contraceptives from the north. Enough already with your exclusive phallocentric concentration on condoms. She has never described gays as “sexual and moral perverts” and i note that you do not say so either – you dishonestly elide that interpretative quote (your interpretation) into another quote – your interpretation ?- into another one about her opinion about atheists. jaysus, but i dislike dishonesty. let her quotes, – not yours – speak for themselves. if you have to lie – and you do – your argument falls.

nell mc cafferty

hey mate, i read about your passion for pro vercelli, i’m from vercelli and i’m a big supporter of “PRO” so if you want some information, photos, merchandaisng etc etc tell me something! my mail is hcdani@gmail.com

bye!

Lies make baby jesus cry.

visit random tv sets?

im so sad, what are we gonna do with our lives

Yes, but it isn’t being transmitted as the work it encodes. It’s being transmitted as a sequence of numbers. Thus, using the numbers to produce a copyrighted work would still be illegal, but transmitting the numbers is no more illegal than adding them together and dividing by eleven.